this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
179 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37801 readers
264 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They’re affordable and ubiquitous, but homeowners shouldn’t be able to act as vigilantes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FiniteLooper@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

So what is a good camera system to own? I currently have ADT and I'm really not happy with it. It's expensive and the cameras only record 30 second clips. It can detect motion, it records 30 seconds and that's it, regardless of how long the motion event actually takes.

Example: someone drops off a package and they hang out on my porch - I have no idea what happens after the 30 second mark! It's insane. No way to change this either. The only option is for how long to wait between 30 second clips, and the lowest option is 2 minutes.

[–] ainakine@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago

As a live DIY system we use Jami (free), laptops, and webcams to monitor our property. We haven't tried recording for extended periods but with enough disk space extended recording could be accomplished.

[–] lemming007@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Reolink or Amcrest or any other Ethernet hardwired ones with NVR that you can host in your house. No WiFi and no third-party/cloud storage ones like Ring or Nest.

[–] jabib@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Amcrest is what I inherited when I purchases my house. Just know they really don't support their older stuff at all. My NVR is inaccessible from any modern web browser, and Amcrest has no plans to update the firmware (latest version from 2018) AND ignored my questions in email when I wanted to verify the latest firmware for my model number since it didn't appear on their site at all.

That said, the cameras are great and the system works well, its just not as simple compared to newer solutions.

[–] lemming007@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, Amcrest NVR software sucks. Reliable cameras though.

[–] FiniteLooper@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I had looked into Reolink a while back and that seemed like a great option to me. Upfront cost and setup seems like the biggest hurdles, but probably worth it in the long run. Thanks for the recommendation!

[–] Stan@lemmywinks.com 3 points 1 year ago

ADT sucks for a ton of reasons. Fuck them.

[–] bumblebrainbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I have Kuna cameras (previous owners installed them) and I hate them. They require a subscription to use security cameras in the way you'd normally use them. For no subscription, any recording only stays for 2 hours then gets deleted. What is the point of cameras if my recording is gone by the time I realize I have that notification? I refuse to pay a subscription to cameras I allegedly bought with the home.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I have blink cameras on solar panels that work pretty well as a mostly "no wires" solution. The motion detection can be a bit slow, but they do everything I need.

[–] phillycodehound@geddit.social 1 points 1 year ago

ADT is the worst. I have a Ring camera, I know, I know. It as before I knew of all this. But it works and keeps my house safer.