this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
43 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
377 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How about we just stop eating them? Jesus Christ, there's no such thing as "caring about animals", "animal welfare", and "humane treatment" when the goal is to breed and slaughter them.

Consumers are ultimately the ones in control here. Switch to plant-based and these companies will follow, because the only caring they do is for profits.

[โ€“] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The carnist-compatible alternative is to just stop pretending to care about animal welfare.

Itโ€™s a consistent moral position to say โ€œanimals exist as my prey and their feelings donโ€™t matter to meโ€, but it directly conflicts with this hypocrisy where we act like baby farm animals and dogs and cats are soooo cute, and then we conveniently ignore everything that happens on the farm and downstream because it doesnโ€™t suit that narrative.

What drives me absolutely crazy is when people willingly say โ€œI donโ€™t like to think about where my grocery store meat comes from!โ€ but continue to buy it.

[โ€“] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yup. Either come to terms with the fact that a sentient being had to die for this meal, or stop eating meat altogether.

It's actually why I'm getting into hunting now. I'm not taking a life for profit, like the slaughterhouses are. I'm taking a life for the food and materials it provides. And if I'm not comfortable killing with my own hands, I don't get to eat meat.

I really believe that buying meat at a grocery store is less ethical than hunting. If everytime someone wanted meat they had to kill an animal themselves, there would be a lot more vegetarians.

Excuse me sir, I don't appreciate you causing me mental discomfort by having to reevaluate the beliefs that I was raised with.

That's why I only eat cows that are organic, grassfed, and humanely treated. They get to live out their lives frolicking free in the fields due to the loosely defined "free range" requirements. Except for when they take a bolt gun to the head at a fraction of their lifespan but we don't like to think about that.

[โ€“] baconisaveg@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why not just stop eating entirely then? Why continue to eat vegetables picked by poorly treated migrant workers? Why continue to eat grains covered in pesticides that pollute the local ground water?

Either commit to not partaking in any product that causes social issues, or get off your throne.

[โ€“] festus@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's about reducing harm. Are all crops grown the way I would like? No. But farm animals also have to be fed these same crops, so when you eat meat you not only contributed to the animal cruelty and substantial amounts of the crop-harms you identified, while a vegetarian or vegan only contributed to a lesser amount of the crop-harms.

It's not practical to live without causing any harm somewhere, but that's not an excuse to pretend that all lifestyles are equally harmful.

[โ€“] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

animals are mostly fed plants or parts of plants that people can't or won't eat: cows graze on grass, or are fed silage which includes things like cotton seed and corn stalks. you can eat the corn and wear the cotton and eat the cow.

[โ€“] festus@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe in some narrow cases but I'd take issue with your use of 'mostly'. Here's an article about a study that looked at the environmental damage of different diets and a vegan diet is significantly, significantly better for the environment - and that's not even considering animal welfare.

[โ€“] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

a vegan diet isn't any better for the environment at all. producing the parts of a vegan diet INSTEAD of the parts of some other diet WOULD be better but that's not what happens: the omnivorous products continue to be made in growing amounts while vegan products are ALSO increased.

[โ€“] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

that study depends on a number of other studies with dubious methodology. i wouldn't trust that study just based on the studies on which i know it relies.

[โ€“] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The goal isn't perfection, but not eating animals is an easy step that we can all take, which prevents some of the worst suffering. It's also better for the planet, food security, etc.

The other points you make can already be mitigated, i.e. buy local, buy organic, grown your own, etc., but we should also strive to improve those situations overall.

Eating lower in the food chain is always going to be better than eating higher up. Farmed animals are eating those grains covered in pesticides, too, and at much higher quantities than we are.

So, not eating them remedies at least some part of your concerns.๐Ÿ‘

[โ€“] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

not eating animals is an easy step that we can all take, which prevents some of the worst suffering

that doesn't prevent any suffering. if you want to prevent suffering, go to where there is suffering, and prevent it.

[โ€“] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pro tip: You can prevent suffering on farms by going to a grocery store and not buying animal products. Amazing, but true!

[โ€“] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago

that doesn't work.