this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
354 points (99.7% liked)

Canada

10588 readers
1135 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Burlington homeowner is fighting charges over her “naturalized garden” of native plants in her front and back yards. The city is taking Karen Barnes to Provincial Offences Court, seeking up to $400,000 in fines for violating a bylaw order to cut it down.

Barnes is challenging the case on constitutional grounds, arguing her right to freedom of expression through gardening is protected under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

She says her garden supports pollinators, biodiversity and wildlife, reflecting her environmental and spiritual beliefs. She appeared for a pre-trial hearing on Wednesday and is scheduled for a two-day trial in November, according to her lawyer, Vilko Zbogar.

Zbogar says the case is about more than the fine. “Courts have recognized since at least 1996 that freedom of expression under the Charter protects natural gardens as expressions of profound environmental values,” he said. “For Karen, it’s also a spiritual exercise — tied to her creed and beliefs. This falls under Sections 2(a) and 2(b) of the Charter: freedom of conscience and religion and freedom of expression.”

Experts say naturalized gardens and meadows can attract far more pollinators than regularly mown lawns, while also using less water and improving soil health.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 48 points 1 month ago (13 children)

The term "weed" is stupid. Arbitrarily deciding that certain native plants are undesirable is such a colonizer mindset

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 12 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Mmh, I'd describe it more as self-centered in general, since there are plants the world over that get called weeds. "We don't see any value in this, therefore it should be eradicated in favour of things we can use."

[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In favour of things which we have no use for as a status symbol.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Your only comparing it to grass doesn’t help.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)