this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
340 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2762 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
340
Even the Tesla Cybertruck's Brake Lights Don't Make Sense (www.thedrive.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
100 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Even the Tesla Cybertruck's Brake Lights Don't Make Sense::Brake lights shouldn't be confusing, but Tesla's determined to be different with the Cybertruck, for better or worse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 42 points 1 year ago (22 children)

Ok call me crazy but wouldn't the requirements be written in law? I'd expect in many countries it simply wouldn't be able to be sold.

[–] jve@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (10 children)

From the article

The Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards regulate taillight design, mandating minimum area, placement, quantity, and visibility according to vehicle category, dimensions, and weight. However, the FMVSS does not appear to prohibit deactivating taillights during braking, so the Cybertruck's taillights as seen here seem to be legal—even if they are perplexing, and potentially dangerous.

I still can barely believe this thing is real, and not something out of a bad 90s movie where video game characters come into the real world.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 14 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I was more meaning in a wider sense. A car manufacturer who can't sell their cars outside the US is shooting themselves in the foot.

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Manufacturers usually have separate models, a standard one for the whole world and a cut down version to save cost for the US

[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's not "common" at all for US cars to have a lesser model. I can think of 1 popular model off the top of my head.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No it is pretty common, especially when it comes to safety features.

The EU has stricter requirements especially stuff like lights, and you see European models often fitted with extra lights to comply with the regulations.

Technology connections has an old video on this regarding brake lights and turn signals at least https://youtu.be/O1lZ9n2bxWA?si=h5I-5_BMLoFEoj1k

[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

🙄👌👍 having different LEDs is a cut down model. 👍

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

It sure is, significant cost savings to only stock one part rather than two. Multiply that by thousands of service centers and millions of vehicles

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not having distinct brake and turning lights is

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)