Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

[D] whole learning ML math, can I skip proofs? (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by Coc_Alexander@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am following an educator where he gives statement and proves them, as normal. But he uses rigorous maths to prove them and my goal is just to know and apply math. Should I skip the proofs. The proofs are length and skipping them feels like I am loosing a lot of things?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sohaibsoussi@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

In my engineering school, a bunch of students don't study math behind Machine learning but I believe spending some time in math makes you a better AI developer, but it depends on your purpose .