this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
426 points (99.5% liked)

movies

1785 readers
615 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ozoned@piefed.social 72 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I'm SUPER excited, but also VERY concerned. So I'll be cautiously optimistic. But seeing the new Naked Gun with Liam Neeson, though a completely unrelated project, I'm hopeful that today's Hollywood might actually be able to pull this off.

[–] TheMadCodger@piefed.social 39 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Wait, was Naked Gun an actually good remake? I just assumed it wouldn't be.

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago

Oh it was. My gf described it as a naked gun movie. Not better, not worse. The right amount of stupidity and the right kind.
Example from early on in the movie:
"Im sorry detective, im not myself today"
"No worries, im not you either"

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I thought it was fantastic from beginning to end. Liam needing killed it. And it was, so, so stupid.

[–] towamo7603@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Being constantly handed and throwing away coffee in increasingly ridiculous places and larger cups had my dying.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

That and the part in the beginning when paying respects to their fathers.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

It just kept going, too.

They were so skilled with the background jokes, too.

There's at least one joke that can only be seen by watching with subtitles. That's dedication.

[–] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Well fuck me, I was going to skip it, but reading your comment I’m going to give it a go

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

It wasn't terrible, but still not as good as the original. I don't think anyone can replace Leslie Nielsen.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Casting Liam Neeson is strong evidence they understood the assignment. You need a dramatic actor to lead a Naked Gun film.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 days ago

You need an actor with a name that's hilariously similar to Leslie Nelson. Lol

I'm convinced this was 90% of the reason he was picked.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

I agree with this, it was a Naked Gun movie and as a standalone product I enjoyed it quite a bit.

It wasn't Leslie Nielsen, but they do have the same initials so that's good enough for me.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I loved it. I love the original 3 movies and the season of police squad. Liam did a great job and I laughed a bunch.

They did good and I hope spaceballs 2 can be similar.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

It was hilarious. I was full on belly laughing at some parts which is something I dont recall doing during any other movie in recent memory.

[–] TheSambassador@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's actually really great. Not the funniest movie I've ever seen, but they did the series justice and did just enough new things to keep it fresh. Would recommend giving it a watch if you like stupid humor.

[–] TheMadCodger@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago

Part of my hesitation is I normally don't like stupid humor, but I remember loving the series as a kid. I'll probably watch it anyway.

[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

The thing is, there is a related project: History of the World, Part II. YMMW on whether that dampens or increases your optimism.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I heard an interview with Josh Gadd who wrote the thing and pitched it to Mel. Filled me with optimism