this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2025
64 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

12401 readers
834 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca
EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
64
EA's Blockbuster $50 Billion Deal To Go Private Revealed (screenrant.com)
submitted 2 days ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] azdle@news.idlestate.org 47 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Before anyone thinks this could be good news for EA...

The offer comes from a group of investors that includes Silver Lake, one of the world's largest private equity firms, and Saudi Arabia's controversial Public Investment Fund.

WSJ states that it would "likely be the largest leveraged buyout of all time."

A leveraged buyout from a PE firm means they've decided EA needs to die and they're going to pick the carcass clean.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't know Silver Lake, but in the thread Schreirer made when breaking this someone suggested they are not specifically in that business. Which makes sense, that'd be an absolute waste of 50 billion, they're definitely not getting that money back by breaking EA up. They have very, very little marketable IP or assets, considering their major moneymakers are all licensed games, at least outside the Battlefield franchise.

Silver Lake owned GoDaddy for a while. They owned Dell for a while. They seem to have a history of buying companies in big deals, taking them private for a while, then having them go public again later.

I have no idea what that process looks like, but this a) seems to fit their pattern, and b) seems to match other big tech companies that they've bought and continued to be a going concern indefinitely.

I don't know that "good news" is how I'd describe it, but it doesn't mean EA is done, at least up front.

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

Thank you for input that isn't just negative rhetoric.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

NFL football games can heal again

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

I came here to say this. EA has entered the death spiral.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

EA dying is good news. At least this way popular IPs can live on under new management or be sold off.

[–] mushroomman_toad@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

not before the studios are purged, unfortunately

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

On the other hand, the Public Investment Fund is focused on long-term profitability to reduce Saudi Arabia's economic dependence on fossil fuels, so there's a chance EA might improve.

Though their investment isn't a great thing for other reasons, of course.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago

What does this mean for the games they're working on? I mean, I only care about the Jedi: Survivor sequel, but I'd still really like to have it.