this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
41 points (95.6% liked)

Linux

9612 readers
410 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] spartanatreyu@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I'm more interested in what the Oil shell has been doing, it has a higher potential roof while keeping backwards compatibility rather than the current standard of affairs 10ish year development cycle of a new shell with slight improvements.

Switching shells can be a massive pain in the ass, so if we're making a change, it has to be worth it.

Oil looks like it could be worth it and then some.

[โ€“] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Fish was worth it because it works in a way that suits me, and I could tell just by reading its excellent manual.

If you look at Oil and it looks like it suits you, I'm sure it'll suit you. ๐Ÿ‘

For my taste, Oil seems too similar to bash at first glance, and the fact that it has a dedicated "Quirks" section in the docs is a major red flag for me. Personally.