this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
144 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

75989 readers
4065 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
144
How to Get Hardware Transcoding BACK on Your Synology NAS (nascompares.com)
submitted 1 week ago by baronvonj@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Synology’s 2025 refresh brought the DS225+ and DS425+ with the familiar Intel Celeron J4125, but it also quietly removed the kernel graphics driver support that Plex, Jellyfin, and Emby use for hardware transcoding of H.264 and HEVC. This guide explains what changed, why it matters for real-world streaming, and how you can restore GPU-accelerated transcoding on these models using an unofficial SSH method shared by the community. If you rely on your NAS to reshape 4K or high bitrate files for phones, tablets, hotel TVs, or limited connections, this walkthrough will help you get that efficiency back.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rainwall@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'd recommend against it. It works "fine" but everything is in a thin, but walled, garden. Every app is some "Qsomebullshit." They really, really want you in their ecosystem.

Id say the systems are underspec'ed as well. The model I bought years ago pitched itself as VM/container ready, but the chipset was so weak it couldn't run anything worth a damn. It couldn't even run a scrub on lowest priority without choking all other filesystem access. When a scrub takes 3 days or more, it wasn't exactly a usable experience.

If you have the funds, i'd recommend 45drives. They make very good hardware and sell 4/8/15 disc form factors for homelabs.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Synology isn’t any different.

I’d argue a NAS is for storage mostly.

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The vm/container side is less important than the "cant run a RAID parity check regularly because it makes the NAS useless" part. Thats my qnap experience. It might have gotten better, but it was shit heel for me, and the NAS was in the 1k range.

I'd argue that a NAS should be able to run containers at this point. NAS hardware does not need to be utterly gutless just because it can be. A versatile NAS is actually a great first choice for a homelab setup before you start to expand.