this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
71 points (93.8% liked)

Programming

22960 readers
20 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It's not made for scale. Use C/C++ or something if you want scale.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Or you know, TypeScript, Go, C#, Java, Swift, etc. etc.

Python isn't great at anything except for having a lot of data science libraries already written for it.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Not only data science libraries, there is a library for about anything. Which is not the case for your list of languages.

Edit: not all languages in the list.

When you understand how python works, it's quite simple to use too, and has lot less clutter than say java or c#.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago

Not only data science libraries, there is a library for about anything. Which is not the case for your list of languages.

Java has an excellent ecosystem for libraries. And a much more mature one in most cases than Python. The Spring framework alone is simply amazing.

Go's ecosystem is pretty good as well and getting better.

When you understand how python works, it’s quite simple to use too, and has lot less clutter than say java or c#.

The problem is that many python devs consider things like "type hints" and "classes" to be "clutter". It takes a lot of discipline to write managable python. Being "newb friendly" is a curse. "stringly typed" crap does NOT scale well.

[–] namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It can scale though. It parallelizes really well if you use queuing systems to distribute the load. You just have to make sure that the hot loops are in C/C++, and it is very easy to interface with compiled binaries via the C API.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It can scale though.

So can assembly. But it takes a tremendous amount of discipline.

Python's curse is that it's popular with "newbs" who think it's okay to use dictionaries for everything and that type hints are "clutter".

Agreed. I have seen a lot of Python code that was really painful to massage back into a more structured object hierarchy. Java certainly does a bit better in that respect, and as a language, it does a much better job of encouraging better practices, but I think it's also largely due to the kinds of people that use those languages as well.

[–] feddylemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Instagram runs on django.