this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2025
112 points (98.3% liked)
Technology
40445 readers
339 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Really good article and worthwhile a read!
I haven't shopped at Amazon for well over a decade now, but apparently even I am affected by their business model...
That is why I get tired about the "individual action" suggestion, that I alone could stop using Amazon and hurt their sales, I could de-Google my life and keep my privacy, or recycle plastic and save the ocean, or swear off AI to fuck with Nvidia.
But all that is a drop in the bucket compared to the millions of people who all readily handed over their lives to these companies and haven't left (or can't). And governments who abdicated regulatory authority to them, which have allowed them to run rampant.
They're still making it so these massive companies have force in my life. I alone can't do anything about that.
Hmm are you implying collective actions are in order?
Well yes, the article is saying exactly that: that individual actions and consumer activism don't do shit and structural changes are needed. It even gives some examples for structural changes that could be helpful in the short-term.
I completely empathize with your frustration and I feel like individual actions are used as a way to give people some feeling of power that they don't have and that stays ineffective. It takes the pressure off of companies to change while giving people the feeling like the achieved something. And politicians in most countries don't have an incentive to change the system either because they live off of lobbying and may get a job at those companies later.
I added the anecdote in my original comment just because I was surprised at the scale that Amazon had an impact on the economy. And yes, it obviously didn't do much when I took individual action and boycotted them (apart from giving me a feeling of some integrity).
100% with you, well put
That surprised me. I always try to buy from the manufacturer's website or official reseller rather than Amazon to avoid such bullshit. Apparently that's not enough.
If brands selling on Amazon are overpriced, everywhere, could favoring brands that do NOT sell on Amazon help find products with a fair price?
Interesting. Not selling your stuff on amazon could possibly be a selling point for a new business.
I doubt "Not on Amazon" would be a selling point. If merchant have put up with it this far, it's probably because Amazon bring sales.
If leaving allow selling at a lower price, that would definitely be a selling point. But they would need a solid online store, their own or another markeplace.