this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
110 points (99.1% liked)
Progressive Politics
3355 readers
319 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Cool, how much is that per killed child? Or per dead mother?
Should the distribution be weighted based on killed or maimed?
What's the weighting for being burned head to toe, blinded or legs torn off or arms crushed from a building collapse?
Or just straight up executed by the IDF for daring to get in line for food for your family?
I bet these numbers are in some spreadsheet somewhere. Got to account for all that good money spent right?
$300000 per victim.
Recently I had a showerthought about the American MIC. Capitalism optimizes for profit and profit alone. If we apply this logic to the MIC, it follows that the MIC makes money, not weapons. And we know they make a shit ton of money. So that made me think - the US probably doesn't have as much military equipment as their budget suggests, when compared to countries whose MICs aren't as good at profit optimizing. Like say India probably doesn't have 11x less military equipment than the US given their budget is 11x smaller. I wonder if there's any truth to this shower thought at present. The way it's going, I expect the American military to be hollowed out over time.