this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
-15 points (29.7% liked)
Privacy
42424 readers
940 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If like me you are both lazy and not a lawyer, check ToS;DR https://tosdr.org/ but honestly it's like labels on food products.
You don't need the damn label to know that Coca Cola is not good but water is... so yes, don't use Facebook, great. You knew that already if you care just a bit about privacy.
Still, if you want to go there, please do check https://tosdr.org/ and if you can contribute back.
What I personally find more useful is F-Droid because if an app is not present on it, it's rarely because technically it can't, it's often because of anti-patterns. The app tries to go on F-Droid only to realize it's not "just" another store but they have rules, good rules IMHO, like no Google Analytics and whatever backends to track user behavior.
Also Android app analysis like https://exodus-privacy.eu.org/ is quite good, same idea, finding anti-patterns but not in code (which isn't a good start if it's not FOSS anyway) but rather in how the app actually behaves.
TL;DR: yes, do read the ToS if you can, but if you can't don't just press "yes" or avoid and move on, rely on the work of others like ToS;DR, F-Droid or exodus-privacy!
I don't really agree that if an app is not on f-droid the it's always bad, maybe a developer don't want to stay behind more stores
I did not say it was always bad :
So we agree. What sparked this reasoning though was https://github.com/Mentra-Community/MentraOS/issues/1168 which as you can see squarely fits in that pattern, namely :
I think it's a great example because it shows that developers themselves might not be aware of the consequence of their choices on privacy. This very project is about augmented reality and the value they try to demonstrate is that, unlike Meta for example, they do care about privacy. Yet, in practice, they do rely on Google components that do share data back.
So sure, I didn't say nor do I think ALL projects missing from F-Droid are because they have anti patterns... but more often than not they do.
PS: also noticed WireGuard is like that too. They force upgrades via their own distribution system and AFAICT F-Droid insists that it's up to the user to upgrade if they want to. It's a hard stance and it has consequences, e.g. maybe some people on F-Droid do not get WireGuard official app, maybe they get a less secure one, maybe they get it out of F-Droid and side-step the anti-pattern ... but it's also understandable.
better than nothing i guess