this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
504 points (98.8% liked)
Funny
12575 readers
969 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No, your body prefers fat as an energy source. Turning muscles into energy is a lot of effort for your metabolism, and building new muscles when you refeed also.
Uhm, no, it builds first fat, needs fat as an "ingredient" to build muscles (makes no sense to build all that muscle if you barely have enough energy to survive). Then burns preferably muscles. Fat is hard to convert, protein (muscle) is easily accessible (bodybuilders take protein as supplement). You need excercise and not just starving to lose weight, no?
And btw, even just keeping muscles needs more energy. Fat not.
No, muscle protein synthesis needs amino-acids. Fat is not used to build muscle
No
Not nearly as hard as it is for the body to atrophy muscle mass, turn the proteins into amino-acids, and turn those amino-acids into glucose and then ATP
It isn't, and the digestion of whey protein supplements can not be compared to muscle atrophy
At this point I'm sure you're just trolling, because that couldn't be further from the truth
True
Keeping fat cells also uses energy, just not nearly as much as muscle mass
If you wanna know my credibility on this topic I would suggest a look at my profile picture