this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2025
70 points (98.6% liked)
Solarpunk Urbanism
2744 readers
1 users here now
A community to discuss solarpunk and other new and alternative urbanisms that seek to break away from our currently ecologically destructive urbanisms.
- Henri Lefebvre, The Right to the City — In brief, the right to the city is the right to the production of a city. The labor of a worker is the source of most of the value of a commodity that is expropriated by the owner. The worker, therefore, has a right to benefit from that value denied to them. In the same way, the urban citizen produces and reproduces the city through their own daily actions. However, the the city is expropriated from the urbanite by the rich and the state. The right to the city is therefore the right to appropriate the city by and for those who make and remake it.
Checkout these related communities:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Can we get a text synopsis for the video-impaired?
It's about the Dutch-style bike intersection, specifically the first one built in Montreal. It sort of extends bike lanes through the intersection. Instead of bikes and cars mixing in the entire square area of the intersection, there are concrete curb islands inside each corner of the intersection separating car lanes from bike lanes. Turning cars have to go around the inside of the islands, which makes drivers slow down which adds safety. Bike lanes are on the outer sides of the islands which reduces the distance cyclists have to ride where they might intersect with a car since cyclists are protected by the islands for parts of the crossing through the intersection. There are other interesections that use the same idea, but apply it to pedestrians rather than bikes.
Drivers complain that the design is a "labyrinth". The video argues people will get used to it when there are more of these.
Left turns are intended to be two-phase, like with unprotected left-turn boxes. First you ride straight across the intersection. Then you stop in a box in the perpendicular bike lane on the other side, which is protected by one of those islands. The box provides space to turn left before stopping. Then when you get a green light for that direction you proceed.
Some cyclists seem to be confused about how left turns are supposed to work. One cyclist merged into traffic before turning, performing the turn in the car lane. Another cyclist crossed both lanes of car traffic before the intersection, rode across the intersection in the bike lane, but going the wrong direction, and finally turned left into the bike lane on the other side.
Car brains complain about a new intersection type imported from Europe. It's nothing special, but prevents cars from cutting corners when turning and gives more space space to pedestrians and cyclists. However, dumb cyclists also have been using it wrong, but there's dumb people everywhere regardless if the intersection type.
Intersections that provide more dedicated space where bicycles and pedestrians aren't using the same roads as cars are good. Sharing the road with cars is bad and dangerous if you aren't in a car.
I looked at the video very quickly. It's a description of the dutch-syle bike protected intersections and how to navigate them with a bike.
AI summary:
The Brilliance of Dutch-Style Protected Bike Intersections
This video explores the design and benefits of Dutch-style protected bike intersections, contrasting them with conventional intersections and addressing common criticisms. The video argues that these intersections, while initially confusing to some, significantly enhance cyclist safety and accessibility by providing dedicated space, protection, and predictability.
Key Points:
Some sort of intersection design, I'm guessing from the video description.