231
Framework flame war erupts over support of politically polarizing Linux projects
(www.theregister.com)
this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
231 points (96.0% liked)
Linux
10111 readers
946 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't support the views of the endorsed projects, but surely a better reaction would be to suggest alternatives instead of just screaming for outright dismissal? I keep reading that "omarchy is just a bunch of scripts" and "hyperland is just one tiling window manager". If that's the case, there probably are better alternatives no? Or if it's as easy as described why not fork it?
Complaining without an alternative or a solution is not productive, IMO
FTFY
And yeah, Framework is one of the few manufacturers designing specifically for Linux compatibility and repairability, and omarchy/hyprland Devs are apparently shitty people. If you think they shouldn't be associated, suggest a different project not run by (possibly) literal Nazis instead of foaming at the mouth and screaming incoherently... doesn't seem that difficult.
This is the biggest issue with niche communities: purity tests. They can't unite under one goal and have productive discussions. They are more focused on being correct (their interpretation of correct) and shutting out the incorrect than getting closer to a goal. Sometimes incorrect can be as little as choosing the wrong utility and other times it can be much bigger but they all spark the same amount of ire.
I don't think we should work with scum like DHH and vaxry just because some asshole lib might accuse us of purity tests
If "not working with people who are maniacs who want you dead" is a purity test I'm dusting off my Inquisition book
The entire ecosystem is full of purity tests. You don't have a CoC? Must be a Nazi! Don't use the right license? Probably a capitalist! You use systemd? Must be a Apple insider! You don't use systemd? Fuck off you troglodyte. Oh my you said "no politics"? Definitely a lib! What's that 🏳️🌈 flag? OMG what a woke commie.
Everyone draws the line somewhere else. Just because you draw it at DHH doesn't mean you're better.
TL;DR;
It's weird to be upset at people for having personal boundaries/morals/ethics.
Using "purity test" like a pejorative, because using a more accurate term makes your argument sound bad, is a bad faith approach.
You say "purity tests" like it's some sovcit term imbued with magical powers, like DEI or woke.
Headcanon replace it with "personal ethics and morals" and you might see how some of those arguments are really just people having boundaries.
An example of what i mean.
vs
See how the rest of that statement sounds without the bad faith, magic-word interpretation ?
I'm not expecting any good faith arguments in response, so don't worry, this was a just-in-case kind of thing.
Great argument there. Replace what I say with whatever you think it says and go on from there. Should I just do the same with yours and we'll see what kind of nonsense comes out? I'm sure that would be in your interpretation of "good faith".
But don't worry, I don't expect a coherent response. This was a just-in-case kind of thing 😉
I mean, yes... that is what i did... i explained as i did it.
Was this a preface to actually doing this? is there a part of the text missing ?
Yep, here we go. I'm a nazi now 🙄 This is exactly how you edge people out. You're just the another flavor of "everything I don't like is wOkE" but instead "everything I don't like jNaZi!".
Nobody's in the middle. There's no nuance. You're either on my side or you're an enemy. Life's just that simple.
I firmly believe there are ways of being a centrist without being a Nazi. Hell, I believe you can be a pre-Trump-era Republican without being a Nazi. But there are also fascists who self-identify in these factions, and they benefit from the smokescreen of the "Everyone I don't like is a Nazi" fallacy of argument. There is nuance. I can't help but feel that you're projecting.
Ethnic cleansing and its supporters are definitionally fascists though, and I don't believe organizations should support those people. And David Heinemeier Hansson, like the Nazis, is a fascist. And I find it suspect and disturbing that people are referring to that as purity-testing.
If your default is equating "centrist" to "nazi", then I wonder what kind of experiences you had but it's so far from mine that it's pointless to continue this.
Not my default, but okay, you're clearly bad faith. I'm done. Goodbye.
"You don't agree with me? Must be a Nazi" / "You don't agree with me? Must be woke"
👍
Meanwhile in reality:
"Why are all these people calling me a nazi, I just think nazi's should receive funding is all!"+
👍
Read the very first comment I made again. If your interpretation of my words is still the same, maybe you'll have to work on your English comprehension.
"If you don't have an alternative shut up and don't fight the nazis getting funded"
Y'know, knowing that you live in DACH, I can't help but read this as sour grapes: if only you were allowed to be more fascist, but those mean old online communists just won't let you!