this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
105 points (92.0% liked)

Canada

7134 readers
426 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 29 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I was trying to escape beer to save money, but at $2 a can non-alcoholic is even more expensive despite seemingly less taxes needing to be paid.

[–] rbn@feddit.ch 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Is non-alcoholic beer reallly more expensive than the regular? In Europe they're on par in most places. In Northern Europe (Norway, Denmark) it's even significantly cheaper due to taxes.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes, it tends to be pricier. It's not addictive, so they need bigger margins that they can't make up in volume.

[–] ribboo@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago

It’s actually a more costly process to make non alcoholic beer, than with alcohol.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

You ever tried kombucha, it may hit the spot similarly.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

My initial assumption was that it's because it's newer, ~~so they need to make up that r&d cost~~ (edit: I get why this is silly now). Once there is a lot more competition for it, the prices should come down. Similar to how some plant based meats / milks or gluten-free products became more accessible once general people started buying them instead of a tiny group that could be exploited more easily.

I'm just hoping for fewer drunk driving accidents and reduced health issues

[–] Alphadef@programming.dev 21 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Oh boy you are painfully optimistic about capitalism

[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Let us not forget, 1 trillion types of non alcoholic drinks already exist.

People don’t event know when they a being marketed.

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

That’s the nicest way to put it lol

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

fair, again I'm just hopeful that this will become a good option for people

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

R&D cost lol, there’s no such thing. That’s what companies want you to believe so they can upsell medicine and technology.

This is just another market rife for capitalism to ensnare. Some guy crunched the numbers and found that x% don’t drink at events. So to recoup that lost revenue, they made this. The drinks, the ads, the news articles that cover it. All planted to drive up their bottom line.

Because that’s how businesses work. They find an angle and swoop in and start setting up payment systems to see what people will begrudgingly pay for.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I was equating them, probably incorrectly, to things like plant based meat companies that did have to consider margins till they could scale up.

But yes I guess a major conglomerate doesn't have that constraint, and it's probably not that hard to make something that tastes like X beer without alcohol

[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Non-alcoholic beer is older than most of the people in this thread commenting¹. There's no more "R&D cost" involved in making it. If they're charging more for the non-alcoholic than the alcoholic, it's just straight-up greed.


¹ Source: I was drinking this shit when I was 12—45 years ago, in other words—and even then it was old news!