Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

[D] What are people working on when they say they work on Causal ML? (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by poitrenaud@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Genuinely trying to understand.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lionlai1989@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the idea behind machine learning is that it can learn correlation and causality automatically. Can someone give an example of using causal ML to better solve a problem than non-causal ML methods?

[–] poitrenaud@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

You framed my question in a better way, thank you.