this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
30 points (60.9% liked)

Memes

52944 readers
653 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (11 children)

Yes. And if we had started on this project in the aftermath of 2016, we'd have a viable third party.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago (5 children)

If ifs and buts were candies and nuts we’d all have a merry Christmas. We can only work in the reality we have, not the one we want. As long as voters are married to the idea that the only meaningful opposition to Republicans is the Democratic Party, then that’s what we’re stuck with.

I think it’s far more viable to introduce ranked choice voting (which would allow for electing a third party while ensuring voters aren’t ’throwing away their vote’ if the third party doesn’t win) than it would be to convince the vast majority of Democratic voters to abandon the party and vote for a party that has won no elections. Maybe that would have worked a century ago when there were more parties and people were more used to the idea of living outside a two party system.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I wish we were when halfway smart enough for ranked choice voting. Unfortunately, not only are most voters too dumb to get it, but many jurisdictions are actually banning in right now.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 days ago

Well yeah, it makes it harder for them to win. Especially after seeing it help a dem win in Alaska

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)