this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
365 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

59157 readers
2489 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
365
The future of warfare: A $400 drone killing a $2M tank (www.politico.eu)
submitted 1 year ago by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
55 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

If only we could be sure that $400 drones will only ever be used to kill tanks, and never to kill neighborhoods ...

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm waiting for the panic that will happen at the first political assassination using drones

[–] aeronmelon@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Several years ago, before COVID, the Japanese government was on high alert because someone parked a drone on the roof of the Prime Minister's office. Small traces of (harmless) radiation were detected on the drone and no one knows who put it there or why.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago

It’s entirely possible someone just flew it around near Fukushima, brought it to near the PM’s office, and then parked it on the roof as a political statement

[–] variants@possumpat.io 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Im pretty sure I read a few years ago someone tried in like south america, I'll have to look it up

edit: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-45073385

[–] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would make HOA meetings rather ackward... and dangerous.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I wonder if the second amendment people will get behind drones. It isn't like you are going to be able to defend your house when someone across a continent can set it on fire.

Imagine that brave new world. People walking around with a personal protection drone following them. Schools needing to invest in Iron Dome type anti-drones drones.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You can. It takes a much bigger drone to kill an entire neighborhood.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago

Bigger drones, or just more drones.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah for now. What happens when someone attaches a laser to one that can start fires?

[–] variants@possumpat.io 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=QR7vwRC6SFE

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] Skwerls@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago

One gas main is all it takes