this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
14 points (79.2% liked)

Technology

77096 readers
3169 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
14
Question on TV's (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm a little out of the loop on TV's. I mainly PC game, but have a few consoles as well. My question is, what is a TV made today that just has the lowest possible input lag? I don't give a crap about quality or any of this 1440p (i?) stuff (stopped caring many years ago. I still watch VHS tapes on my CRT's). All I care about is input lag because it ruins the gaming experience for me.

Currently have a shitpile Insignia that is so bad, you can't game on it (even racing games) and it's so slow that video and audio often get out of sync on it and it needs a factory reset. It was free so i've been using it but it's just upsetting me now. I'm wiling to drop $500-800 on an enjoyable gaming TV if something like that exists for that price. Something 40" or so is just fine with me. For reference the newest console on it would be a Xbox 360. I don't play anything older than PS2 on modern TV's as CRT's are better in every way for old consoles.

Otherwise, I'll just go back to all CRT and projector TV for consoles.

thanks yall!'

Edit: i also didn't clarify, but I'd really like to not use a smart TV. I really hate them. I just want a TV to be a TV if possible, or have the least possible amount of features.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I suppose,id rather not have any of it though. Tvs never used to have any of these features and they worked just fine.

[โ€“] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Game consoles never used to have those features either. ๐Ÿ˜‰ That's the trick, you need a set that supports modern console features.

HDR management being a good one. The game developers encoded HDR to make a game look a specific way, you don't want a set that either over-rides it and does it's own, similarly you don't want a dumb set that doesn't support HDR.

[โ€“] anon5621@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not anymore all TVs are "smart" nowdays they don't sell dumb TVs,also i missing ips to not have burned pixels as phones has and also many modern matrix quality is suck actually, I checked one local shop and changing angle of view on small degree losing color details dramatically

[โ€“] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

Dumb TVs are still readily available. They are intended for commercial use and will suck for games or movies though.