this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

LocalLLaMA

3 readers
1 users here now

Community to discuss about Llama, the family of large language models created by Meta AI.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Wondering what everyone thinks in case this is true. It seems they're already beating all open source models including Llama-2 70B. Is this all due to data quality? Will Mistral be able to beat it next year?

Edit: Link to the paper -> https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.17680

https://preview.redd.it/kdk6fwr7vbxb1.png?width=605&format=png&auto=webp&s=21ac9936581d1376815d53e07e5b0adb739c3b06

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] FPham@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It looks weird going from 75B text-davinci-003 to 20B gpt-3.5-turno. But a) we don't know how they count this - a quantization effectively halves the number of parameters and b) we don't know anything how they made it.

except c) they threw much more money at it, using humans to clean the dataset. A clean dataset can make 20B sing. We are using META chaos in llama2 70b with everything thrown at it...

text-davinci-003 is 175B. You missed a 1 there