politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
A lot of them aren’t up for reelection before the goldfish populace forgets about this entirely.
So we remind them. Preferably by fielding candidates that will actually fight for us, and aren't afraid to point that fact out. Loudly.
Building up a real base of support takes time. As in, 4-5 years worth of time. Might as well get started while people are pissed.
I’ve been at it for 25 years and it still hasn’t happened
Mamdani won. He seems like the real deal, too.
If he can do it, we can too. We'll build a whole new party if we have to, but we'll get people in office who will actually fight for us.
One guy, in an intensely blue city, against universally despised opponents does not a political revolution make.
That's true, but it's also intensely pessimistic. Take the opportunity to celebrate the rare wins that come along.
I’m way past pessimism, in part because all I’ve seen my whole life are small victories
Um... at this rate in 4-5 years America will be a fascist hellscape. There is no 4-5 years.
The best time to plant a tree...
Organizing is organizing. If you have enough people in your corner to win an election, you have enough people to blow up a bridge.
Or has everyone forgotten why we hold elections in the first place? Voting is a proxy for fighting. If they won't hold a fair election, make them. Remind the oligarchs why we have elections in the first place.
Not if your organization's membership (and, perhaps more importantly, leadership) is stacked with people who are axiomatically opposed to blowing up bridges. If you intend to blow up bridges in the future, the work on that starts now, not when elections inevitably fail.
Sure, but you can only make them while they're vulnerable (aka right now). It's notoriously hard to make autocrats hold elections after they've successfully abolished them. MAGAts know they'll lose control of Congress in the midterms, so their only hope is to overthrow democracy by January 2027. Do you understand what this means? By the time you're voting for your "candidates who will fight for us" it will already be too late, and by that point "making them" will be easier said than done.
Ideology is malleable. People aren't nearly as "axiomatically opposed" to anything as you think they are.
If your organization is already taking direct action (protests, strikes, sit ins, peaceful civil disobedience) then your tactics will naturally escalate as the government becomes more authoritarian. If you pitch extreme tactics now, though, the only people who will join will be the craziest.
They won't abolish elections all at once. Their strategy for the midterms - or at least what it seems to be - is voter suppression and gerrymandering. Those are powerful tools, don't get me wrong, but not so powerful that they're invincible.
Obviously it would have been better to already be organized, but failing that, the best time to organize is now.
As history shows, quite a few people will hold onto their flawed worldviews even as everything around them falls apart. It's entirely plausible for an organization to fail to adapt to changing circumstances and fail miserably at its purpose; it happens all the time.
Sure, that's fair, but that only holds if we're talking about direct action. Direct action and electoral politics are fundamentally different courses, and there's no guarantee that the latter will escalate into the former. My point is: If you'll organize, you have to organize around direct action, not elections. Also just in case, protests only count as direct action when they meaningfully obstruct power; otherwise they're just parades.
True, but what I'm getting at is: What will happen if/when they lose their majority in either house in the midterms? Will they just turn over power? And risk being held accountable for their crimes? Will Trump allow himself to lose his only shot at becoming a fascist dictator? No, they'll launch a coup and worry about the details later. I think we've seen too many Sieg Heils for "it can't happen here" to still hold water. They'll launch their coup and there's frankly very little in America that can stop them right now. Hence, it'll be up to popular grassroots resistance to do something about it, and the work to make sure such resistance exists starts now, not after the coup is already a done deal. Also, you know, ICE is still kidnapping people off the street and someone also needs to do something about that.
I disagree. Are there plenty of people who vote who don't understand direct action? Sure. But I can't imagine anyone who really understands direct action isn't bothering to vote when given a chance to.
I don't know why this gives leftists so much trouble when the fucking fascists seem to understand it intuitively. Does anyone think the Proud Boys don't vote? Politics and activism are all pretty seamless to conservatives, don't see why we can't seem to grasp it.
Case in point. You have no problems imagining a world in which Republicans are running for office on Tuesday and then planning a coup on Wednesday. Why is it so implausible that we embrace a diversity of tactics to achieve our goals?
Absolutely. And you can go to the firing range on Monday and then to the ballot box on Tuesday and then plant a community garden Wednesday. Resistance is 90% organization anyways, so if you're getting to know your neighbors and building a network of people you trust then you're already most of the way there. If you're already emphasizing a diversity of tactics then there really is no contradiction in supporting an electoral candidate with one hand and creating an armed resistance with the other.
They should be in fear of their lives then.