this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
343 points (98.9% liked)

Linux Gaming

22166 readers
1064 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Perhaps the issue is, partially, structural?

I know some games are super competitive, but what if we generally went back to user hosted (and moderated) lobbies? They clean their own house. Some cheaters would get through, sure, but I feel like there's more social pressure not to cheat among a group of friends vs. raging strangers.

[–] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

because online multiplayer games are now made as a service. they need a centralized server for matchmaking and give you access to micro-transactions

[–] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It also leaves room for something silly that I've always wanted to do

An online lobby where cheating is completely allowed

[–] Osan@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that just be a modded server?

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Nah, that would be 2b2t. Anarchy Server - no rules except preventing the server from functioning.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

2b2t, the oldest anarchy server in Minecraft

[–] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 week ago

We can't have that, it would stop them from killing games to make you buy the new version and would probably make implementing microtransactions harder