this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

LocalLLaMA

1 readers
1 users here now

Community to discuss about Llama, the family of large language models created by Meta AI.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
communick@poweruser.forum
1
LoRA Fine-tuning Efficiently Undoes Safety Training in Llama 2-Chat 70B (arxiv.org)
submitted 10 months ago by ninjasaid13@alien.top to c/localllama@poweruser.forum
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CasualtyOfCausality@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

It's not unique to this paper, especially on ArXiv, but it is always a sign of lazy and quantity-over-quality research when you lift a figure from another paper (LoRA) and neglect to cite that the figure is a copy from another paper.

They do cite the paper but not the figure. It seems like a small issue for such a simple one, but as someone who has worked on designing clear scientific figures, it's annoying to see this behavior.