this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
40 points (97.6% liked)

Futurology

0 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wahming@monyet.cc 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Universal healthcare is a thing. The US is possibly the only first world exception. I live in Norway, and pay a maximum of $250 a year on medical expenses. Everything else gets covered by the govt.

[–] vind@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm aware. However, things like this feel like it would be considered beauty care which generally is not considered to be applicable for universal healthcare.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Age-related symptoms and diseases are the biggest burden on healthcare infrastructure. Anything that reduces said impact would definitely fall under healthcare.

[–] vind@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, but history this doesn't support that belief. Unfortunately

[–] RatherBeMTB@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Not if you'll die. Age reversal will be a must for 80 yo people.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Given the history of medical research, we certainly owe Norway rats one.