this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
43 points (93.9% liked)

Linux

60242 readers
1355 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What exactly is the point of rolling release? My pc (well, the cpu) is 15 years old, I dont need bleeding edge updates. Or is it for security ?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I use a rolling release for mainly 3 reasons.

  1. Faster access to new (shiny) software/applications. Flatpak and the like could solve this for LTS distros.
  2. Security updates come faster and smoother.
  3. Less chance of an update breaking things. Lots of small and frequent updates, instead of rare and large update packs/stacks.
[–] nous@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Less chance of an update breaking things. Lots of small and frequent updates, instead of rare and large update packs/stacks.

I would say a rolling distro update has a higher chance of it breaking something. Each one might bring in a new major version of something that has breaking changes in it. But that breakage is typically easier to fix and less of a problem.

Point release distros tend to bundle up all their breakages between major versions so breaks loads of things at once. And that IMO can be more of a hassle then dealing with them one at a time as they come out.

I tended to find I needed to reinstall point release distros instead of upgrading them as it was less hassle. Which is still more disruptive then fixing small issues over time as the crop up.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I would say

Is this based on experience? Or are you guessing?

I ask because my lived experience is that rolling releases break less in practice

Before I used rolling releases, I spent more time dealing with bugs in old versions than I do fixing breakages in my rolling disto.

And non-rolling “upgrades” were always fraught with peril whereas I update my rolling release without any concern at all.

[–] nous@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Upgrades is any security or big fix as well. Those tend to be quite safe in point release distros. Upgrading to a new point release version is has all the same problems the rolling release had over the same period all bundle in one messy upgrade (which makes them a huge pain to deal with as they often compound). But between those, the patch upgrades tend to be quite smooth.

I would say the over a longer time period rolling release break in bigger way less often. But they tend to have more but smaller breakages that are easy to trivial to fix.

Good point. Yes. Small breakage means it's easier to fix. Although, the years I've run my rolling release system, I've had it break maybe one of two times. Easily fixed. Both of those was because there was a change that needed a manual intervention, which I did not read about until after, so those were my own fault.