this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
347 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37603 readers
631 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An estimated $4 to $20 billion in value, what is he thinking?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 64 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don’t think twitter has $30B in valuation left. Musk bought it for $44B (which was beyond its value at the time, but okay). Since his takeover, it’s lost between 50-60% of its value. That was as of several months ago, so I have to imagine it’s even less now.

With the loss of brand equity, they might be sliding towards the single digit billions very quickly.

He’s just setting money on fire at this point.

[–] nutbiggums@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have read here on Lemmy someone claim this is all political and just 4D chess to own the libs.

[–] Kerrigor@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What I don't understand is how he can still be in charge, at all? Do shareholders not have any legal mechanism to get him removed?

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

He’s the largest shareholder and it’s a private company, which is why we depend on companies holding his debt for guesstimates about the valuation. There’s no market forces that are punishing him for bad decisions, other than him not being able to service his/twitter’s debt based on twitter’s dwindling income.

Jack Dorsey and his Saudi partners agreed to hold onto their shares (ie, not force Musk to buy them) and together they held about $3.5B out of the $44B valuation when it went private. Dorsey just started offering some super gentle criticism while saying it’s a very hard job.

I don’t know if they’re under NDAs, or if they’re afraid of crashing their investments further by criticizing him in public, or if they just don’t care because what’s a few billion between friends. Maybe they’re sending him angry texts.

I’m just hoping that someone comes out with a tell-all that ends up being a movie called The Anti-Social Network.

[–] Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Musk bought it, he's the sole shareholder now. It's not a public company anymore.

[–] Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Prior to Musk, IIRC, the valuation was around $11B.

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

TWTR had about 765M shares outstanding. I didn’t follow them throughout the entire run up to the Muskening, but it looked like they were averaging somewhere in the neighborhood of $35/share, meaning their valuation would be about $25-30B. I’m deliberately ignoring the fact that they went into the 60s and 70s for an extended period in 2021 because I’m not sure what was driving that apart from cheap money and higher online activity during covid.

I still think he overpaid by a factor of about 1.5.

[–] mlong99@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you’re saying it’s worth at least 20 billion? Still seems too high to me.

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

It’s probably between $15-20B right now.

I think it comes with a salvage title though.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

He bought Twitter back when cash was cheap. That alone could be a couple billion in valuation at least.