this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
164 points (89.4% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
3314 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
164
Model says her face was edited with AI to look white: ‘It’s very dehumanizing’ (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 year ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Shereen Wu says leading designer uploaded altered picture, amid fears AI could ‘turn back the clock’ on progress in the industry

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Patch@feddit.uk 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AI image processing could do the job in two minutes with no skill, whereas manual image editing (even crappily) takes skill and time.

Why assume someone handcrafted it when there's no evidence?

[–] hyperhopper@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Because the article specifically said "AI". It could have just said "edited" and left it at that is the methodology was unknown. But when the methodology is both unknown and doesn't affect the story at all, it's bullshit to put a potential lie in the headline just to act relevant to a different hot topic issue.