this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
416 points (98.8% liked)
Fediverse
38775 readers
431 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah after making an algorithm for peertube I'm gonna say this is too complicated to implement. That graphic might be the the plan and it's something more simplistic.
Making a simple cosign vector for peertube was a pain
What's too complicated exactly? They claim their program does precisely that. I believe you could review the code yourself.
oh lord your looking for a fight. i tell you this i kinda already won since your looking my input to criticize, but ill say this the personalized focus block alone. that's an exact "thing" and if you want more well your gonna have to ask more specific questions and your gonna demand that i help you.
also I helped loops in the past. I can tell you that the GitHub code isn't the code that's used
You're*
really? given that the license is AGPL and they do have some external contributors, they shouldn't be running an unpublished branch of the code!
Yeap, turns out you can post junk code on GitHub and say it runs whatever. I never seen anyone independently verify that the GitHub code runs similar to loops or compiles the code for the app
Not trying to fight, just wanted to get some perspective of someone critical in a thread where everybody else is very positive. I didn't read your username and didn't notice I replied three times to the same guy.
Nice so you got my perspective then?
I didn't fail, I actually succeeded. Plus judging by how hard it was to do a simple algorithm an algorithm like this would take way too much effort.
Given from the infographic they didn't even think about an algorithm let alone worked on it
How do you know it's implemented as described in the picture?
Because I wrote it, just look at the code
I already explained how I know. So you can answer my question or just dodge?
It actually is on account that it's real world experience that gives me insight into how algorithms are done. Expertise you don't have
I'm not worried about credibility since I look more credible than you because you flipped a question and never answered how you know
So buddy you gonna prove the algorithm in loop works exactly like it does in the picture or give me the W?
Nope asking you to prove that the algorithm works like it does in the picture.
I don't helping you understand super basic things
I'll explain it if you admit my points are right and your too ignorant on this subject to argue with me
Well the code is published on github for you to review. I'm sure you can find the functions and variables the digest them in your head to match them to the blocks in the picture
Well you take your L and move on
Sorry it's on you to prove it not me
Nope
You already tried that
Lol you really don't understand recommendation algorithms 🫵🤣