The term "best" is extremely vague. How does one define the "best" anything? There are countless possible options, some of which would absolutely put Taylor as the best. There are also many that wouldn't, some even putting her near the bottom.

Avatar was, and always has been, a movie about the visuals. It's total eye-candy, meant to wow audiences. And if that's how you define the "best" movie, it probably is.

But it's equally valid to define the best as being a total immersion, or drawing your emotions, or being convincing, or having an expansive story to tell. Especially on that last option, Avatar is pretty bad.

Siskel and Ebert were well-known for their movie reviews. Typically, one hated it and the other loved it, and for different reasons. Their goal was to articulate this well enough that you, as a viewer, could determine if you would like the movie. Your "best" movie is unique to you.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago

If Avatar is just about visuals they should have released a screensaver.