this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
18 points (84.6% liked)

Technology

41284 readers
869 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A competitor to Adobe Creative Cloud

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

All good points. FCPX was by all accounts a major step back from FCP, the comparison I heard the most was that it was basically iMovie.

Also, wasn’t the main selling point of FCPX that it was cheaper? I feel like they sold it for ~$100 for a long time. Going from that to $129/yr is bullshit.

[–] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

It was cheaper, but mostly they refocused the product from filmmakers to youtubers. The latter is a 10x (or maybe 100x) bigger customer base, so it sorta makes sense, but unfortunately for Apple they threw away the filmmaker customer base and failed to acquire the youtuber customer base. And the filmmakers didn't forget being cast aside. FCP usage in the industry fall off a cliff and never recovered.

Premiere has a lot of the market share Apple wanted, but even they are losing ground to Resolve; a highly capable product that's inexpensive, and made by a company that doesn't have the baggage of fucking over its customers. Resolve right now is free if you don't need the studio features, and $300 for life if you do.