this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NFL

76 readers
7 users here now

A place for NFL news, game highlights and everything that excites you about American Football.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Introduction

Hello,

We are halfway through the 2023 NFL season, and I wanted to do a quick look into some metrics pertaining to the QB position.

The two main ones are Completed Air Yards ("CAY") and Success Rate ("Succ%")

Completed Air Yards are the amount of yards traveled past the line of scrimmage minus Yards After Catch. Success Rate measures if a play gains at least 40% of yards required on 1st down, 60% of yards required on 2nd down, and 100% on 3rd or 4th down.

I decided to look at CAY because it controls for Yards After Catch, and may be more indicative of a QB's passing abilities. For instance, if a QB throws a slant for 5 yards, but it goes for a 50 yard TD, that was less a consequence of the QB and more a consequence of the receiver and blocking by teammates. Granted, football is a team sport, and even just looking at that is not a comprehensive look at the greatness of a QB; however, that coupled with Succ% gives some insight I think.

Again, not comprehensive, and that is not really what I am trying to go for anyway, but this is more so just to share some interesting findings.

Methodology

All data was taken from Pro Football Reference. I only chose QBs with a minimum of 97 pass attempts. The different metrics I looked at include CAY, CAY/PA, CAY/Cmp, and Succ%.

After copying all the data, I found the Z-score for each individual and their corresponding metric. Then, I did a two-tail test to see which Z-scores were statistically significant. I set alpha to 0.05.

Findings

Table 1

The table above is the dataset pertaining to each individual QB with their corresponding metrics.

Table 2

This table shows the Z-scores for each individual QB and their corresponding metric. The areas highlighted in green are Z-scores that were determined to be statistically significant.

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Tables 3-5 just show the graph version of the datasets from tables 1 and 2.

Z-Score Discussion

The only areas that were found to be statistically significant were the following:

P.J. Walker - CAY (lower end of distribution)

P.J. Walker - CAY/PA (lower end of distribution)

Joe Burrow - CAY/Cmp (lower end of distribution)

Brock Purdy - CAY/PA (upper end of distribution)

Brock Purdy - Succ% (upper end of distribution)

Matthew Stafford - CAY/Cmp (upper end of distribution)

The higher the success rate, obviously the better, and with Purdy his success rate is statistically significant. Some QB's that are close to the upper end (but for whom we would not reject the null hypothesis for) in terms of success rate only really include Allen, Tua, and Goff. On the lower end, Watson, Walker, Wilson and Jones are close, but again, do not cross that critical value of -1.959964.

Limitations

This is not all-encompassing. As far as assessing the QBs, Completed Air Yards and success rate are only part of the equation. There are non-football stat related things to keep in mind, such as personality, experience, age, teammates, and coaches. Taking those into account can help explain why the data is the way it is.

Additionally, a QB can make a great play not through the air. They could very well rush for a big gain or even a TD. This analysis only views the QB position through the prism of passing.

Conclusion

Overall, I think this is interesting, but incomplete. Further inquiry can be made to give a more comprehensive view of the QB position. However, with the metrics we are examining here, I think it is a decent start. Another analysis of this, with more metrics and at the end of the season, would probably be more insightful.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EpiphoneHumbucker4@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is interesting. While I think people work too hard to take YAC out of the equation (it can 100% be a QB skill based on context), I like this. What I’ve noticed about my team is that we’re at our best when Burrow can pick apart teams playing cover 2 by finding short-intermediate holes in zones. Not only is very good at reading a play, but he’s great at looking off defenders trying to read him and making an accurate pass. This also just makes our team better.

Burrow (and the offense in general, but mostly Burrow) gets a lot of shit for not scoring a lot of points, but we win a ton of games because the defense is good and when Burrow is operating at his best, they rarely have to be on the field. Couple that with our defense allowing a ton of yards, but coming up clutch, and you don’t get many high scoring games at all.

[–] QuirkyScorpio29@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because YAC can sometimes be a WR stat that inflates one QB's production because he has better WRs compared to another who's WRs may not be gaining those extra yards on the same exact type of throw.

[–] PlatonicNewtonian@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a blend of QB/receiver skill/scheme/defense these things are hard to measure. It's pretty obvious that incredibly accurate QBs like Drew Brees or Joe Burrow have massively helped their receivers with excellent accuracy, not just getting the ball to the receiver, but hitting them in stride so they can maximise their YAC. If PFF ever charted games from the 80s I'm sure they'd see the same thing with Joe Montana.

[–] EpiphoneHumbucker4@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Right lol. I even said it can be a QB stat based on context, but the QB can be a huge part of YAC. Sometimes it is a guy like Ja’Marr Chase getting the pass and just making something out of nothing… but usually it does have to do with accuracy, decision making, anticipation, and timing. That’s why the best QB’s lead in YAC every year. Patrick Mahomes is always near the top.