this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
178 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

79580 readers
6376 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you’re spending this much on a camera and only shooting JPEG, what are you doing lol

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Ahhh I forgot about Fuji’s film simulations. But I still can’t imagine you spend more than $5k on a camera and use jpegs.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Most “lossless” compressions (e.g. PNG) wouldn’t work here, because they throw away a lot of extra data you get raw from the camera sensor. Hence photographers using their camera’s “raw” file type to retain as much data as possible. A PNG may capture everything you as a consumer sees in an image, but raw file types will retain extra information you can use when editing a photo.