this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
924 points (99.8% liked)

politics

27306 readers
3552 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 156 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

It’s also libel made with actual malice.

[–] 51dusty@lemmy.world 70 points 20 hours ago

right? it is literally the definition of libel...

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 39 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Gonna be a really expensive lawsuit. That is paid out by all of us taxpayers.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 22 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You can sue Donald Trump without suing the US Government. Right now several lawmakers are preparing a lawsuit against Pam Bondi over the Epstein Files.

If we flip the house and senate I'm gonna start sending drafts to representatives for a law that makes the Trump estate and all future president's estates liable for all the avoidable and frivolous lawsuits on the basis of which they did not protect the human beings who live in this nation nor represent the system of laws which govern them, rather that they were personal and need to be paid for personally by the officials responsible for giving the orders resulting in lawsuit.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You would have to show that Trump specifically ordered the alteration. That almost certainly didn't happen and it was someone else in the administration that actually made that call.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

? The boss of an organization is always responsible for what happens in said organization. So, no. They wouldn't.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Gestures broadly at basically every CEO avoiding punishment for the illegal shit their companies do daily

[–] Koarnine@pawb.social 1 points 5 hours ago

Just because they avoid it doesn't mean that the express purpose of a CEO isn't to take that fall...

That's the entire point of the role and excuse for the compensation, is it not?

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Law? In this economy? In this part of the world? Localised entirely within our judicial system?

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 10 points 19 hours ago

And actually published by the government.