this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
49 points (100.0% liked)

Space

7287 readers
1 users here now

News and findings about our cosmos.


Subcommunity of Science


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, how much thrust would you get per kilo of liquid nitrogen? What sort of top speed? Sounds like it would take a decent amount I imagine.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This probably depends on how rapidly you can make the propellant material expand (more force) and how big you can build the expansion chamber/nozzle (more volume).

Practical space propulsion is pretty much just throwing shit out the back of your vehicle as fast as possible.

[–] megopie@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

These kinds of engines get about double the exhaust velocity of high efficiency conventional rockets. (A hydrolox engine like that used on the space shuttle or the centaur upper stage getting an exhaust velocity of about 4500 m/s and a nuclear thermal getting about 8000m/s)