this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
49 points (100.0% liked)

Space

7287 readers
1 users here now

News and findings about our cosmos.


Subcommunity of Science


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Nighed@sffa.community 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I imagine the engine has to weigh a lot more though? So only really suited to huge or deep space missions where also having a nuclear reactor is incredibly useful

[โ€“] megopie@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Oh yah, much heavier, and lower max thrust to, but the whole package is still much lighter considering the huge fuel savings which are most of the mass of the vehicle anyways.

Generally they are mainly intended for longer range missions or where a lot of big maneuvers need to be made. So something that needs to ferry cargo to the moon and back would be an excellent use case.