this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
81 points (98.8% liked)

Selfhosted

60210 readers
1127 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
81
What can you host with limited bandwidth but lots of storage? (lemmy.zip)
submitted 4 months ago by hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I have a limited 20Mbps upload speed but 16 TB of storage. I’m kinda just asking if there’s anything I can use it for. I’ll donate one purpose: seeding Anna’s Archive. Not sure on other causes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Funny how perspective changes things.

Growing up we had dialup. Around 2009 we got 1.5mbps down, something like 300kbps up. DSL, for 8 people.

We had that until.... 2014? 2016? Then we got 10/1.5, mbps, down/up respectively.

We had that until 2022 ish, when we got 30/10. And I started self hosting with ease, plenty of bandwidth for myself and my immediate family's needs.

Only last year, 2025, did we finally strike gold and get access to fiber. 8000/8000 available, but it's spendy.

I'm used to living with significantly less, so I opted for the lowest tier, 300/300.

I feel like I'm legitimately living in the future right now, so fast.

I feel for everyone who is stuck with slow Internet. But it's all perspective. And from my perspective, 20 up is plenty for most things your average person wants to do. More is always better, obviously. But even then, you don't need gargantuan pipes to self host.

I will say, these days, anything less than 10/10 is criminal. 20/20 is slow but manageable. 30/30 is more than most normal people realistically need, though obviously, again, more is always better 🤷‍♂️

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Growing up we had dialup. Around 2009 we got 1.5mbps down, something like 300kbps up

Ahhh, the 'good old days'. Now days I have a business account with Spectrum. 1 gbps down/50 mbps up which is great for uploading and downloading large architectural drawings, but otherwise, it seems excessive.

[–] MatSeFi@lemmy.liebeleu.de 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I will say, these days, anything less than 10/10 is criminal. 20/20 is slow but manageable. 30/30 is more than most normal people realistically need,

... till the start torrenting

[–] hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

I am an avid Linux user and sharer of ISOs, never had a lick of trouble on 30/10.

10/1.5 was tough but doable.

1.5/300k was impossible.