this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
219 points (92.6% liked)

Linux

48092 readers
1498 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by AlpΓ‘r-Etele MΓ©der, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
nooter692@lemmy.ml
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
219
NTFS turns 30 years old today! I hear it's still in use by some crufty old legacy operating systems 😁 (en.wikipedia.org)
submitted 1 year ago by riskable@programming.dev to c/linux@lemmy.ml
54 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Happy 30th Birthday "New Technology" File System! Thanks for 30 years of demonstrating Linux superiority with a gap that widens with every new kernel release πŸ‘

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

NTFS is genuinely inferior in many respects, especially on hard drives, Mister Blue Tribe.

[–] Dax87@forum.stellarcastle.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, NTFS lacks features that surely one of the many Linux filesystems have. But it also has features others do not. There is no one-siize-fits-all filesystem.

  • Ext4 is generally faster than NTFS, but cannot handle as large of files
  • ZFS has a multitude of features that NTFS does not, like zraid, dedup, etc., but usually at the cost of RAM.
  • BTRFS is included in the Linux kernel and also has many features, like being able to conveniently switch hard drive raid-like configurations on the fly with rebalance, but doesn't support fs-level encryption
  • NTFS lacks in many features the others do not, and is a "non-standard" filesystem. However, it's one of the few with better cross-platform support, more advanced access control, pre-emptive journaling, reparse points, etc.

It's quite obvious that my calling out tribalism has felt to you an attack.

We get enough of this "us vs them" mentality in literally every topic and medium. I'd just like a little more nuance and genuine discourse. So I apologize if I've offended you.

[–] neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ext4 is generally faster than NTFS, but cannot handle as large of files

Going to be honest with you, this has not been my experience.

And you can imagine whatever you want, but that doesn't make it reality.

[–] Dax87@forum.stellarcastle.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

? Imagine? 16 exabytes for NTFS according to multiple sources, like Wikipedia and Microsoft documents, and 16 terabytes for ext4.

If you want to refute that then it's most likely you have just had some unlucky experience, and at best it's anecdotal.

Considering your rather disingenuous second sentence, I can see that you are not here to engage in conversation, but to troll. You're exactly what nobody needs buddy. Cya.

[–] neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space 0 points 1 year ago

im not the one who came onto a linux community to talk about how microsoft is better