politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Of all the things... Do they have meetings where they're like, "we're not doing enough pointlessly evil things that have no benefit to anyone!" ‽
"People always tell me that water is great for you. Water's great. Water's great. Which is why I want to do even better than water. Hydrogen sulfide is even better than water, you know. They call water H2O. Well, they call this H2S. And H2S is better for you because it has more protons in it. The sulfur has more protons. And protons are basically hydrogen, and hydrogen is good for you, otherwise water wouldn't be good for you. So everyone should try some hydrogen sulfide, also known as Trump Water. It's real good for you. It is."
Is that a real quote? Seriously asking.
No. But it sounds like something he'd say, doesn't it?
It really does, but it sounds too intelligent is the give away, this guy isn't going to remember new words like that either. I guess that's the tell.
I actually wouldn't be surprised.. In this case it's more likely a call to Trump that went something like "heya fellow rapy, rich dude. Listen, I could afford a lot more new yachts if I didn't have to pay for all this pesky nercury detection and filtering stuff, can you help me out by being your douchy self?"
That's the thing, though: Removing that mercury filtration system is going to be expensive and require re-certification. There's no point. The price has already been paid.
It's like someone heard that mercury removal from coal power plants costs a lot of money and saves lives so they said to themselves, "saving lives‽ We can't have that! The more people that die from pollution, the better!" And set policy based on that instead of examining the reality of the economics.
It will save coal power plants something like 20,000/year, almost nothing considering the amounts they make, according to what I read if I recall correctly.