this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
983 points (98.4% liked)

Privacy

46709 readers
2389 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Telegram is not a private messenger. There’s nothing private about it. It’s the opposite. It’s a cloud messenger where every message you’ve ever sent or received is in plain text in a database that Telegram the organization controls and has access to it”

“It’s like a Russian oligarch starting an unencrypted version of WhatsApp, a pixel for pixel clone of WhatsApp. That should be kind of a difficult brand to operate. Somehow, they’ve done a really amazing job of convincing the whole world that this is an encrypted messaging app and that the founder is some kind of Russian dissident, even though he goes there once a month, the whole team lives in Russia, and their families are there.”

" What happened in France is they just chose not to respond to the subpoena. So that’s in violation of the law. And, he gets arrested in France, right? And everyone’s like, oh, France. But I think the key point is they have the data, like they can respond to the subpoenas where as Signal, for instance, doesn’t have access to the data and couldn’t respond to that same request.  To me it’s very obvious that Russia would’ve had a much less polite version of that conversation with Pavel Durov and the telegram team before this moment"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sifar@lemmy.ml 17 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

That's absurd coming from the founder of a FOSS messaging app who actively decided not to let Signal federate and rejected any other open source Signal client. Not only that, even now you can't truly use Signal's new "username" feature. If any of the recipients have your number stored in their phonebook, irrespective of whether you know them or not, the username goes for a toss. This was/is the problem with Telegram's username feature. Signal knew this and still decided to go ahead with it. Not to mention never doing anything about completely removing the phone number from the account after its creation. This has been, by design, a privacy and hence safety threat, and even after the username feature was implemented, this not getting implemented is very concerning.

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

I'm sorry your free messaging app isn't perfect. /s

And I always assumed that nicknames was just as much to prevent screenshots from becoming a liability.

[–] paequ2@lemmy.today 3 points 9 hours ago

you can’t truly use Signal’s new “username” feature. If any of the recipients have your number stored in their phonebook, irrespective of whether you know them or not, the username goes for a toss.

Hm. I haven't interacted with a new Signal user in a while... but I do see in settings two knobs: "who can see my phone number" and "who can find me with my phone number". Both of these settings can be set to "nobody".

I'm guessing if I set "who can find me with my phone number" to "nobody", then even if someone has my phone number in their contacts, they wouldn't know I'm a Signal user?

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Don't forget not allowing you to sync historical messages between your phone and PC. Apparently somehow that's just too complicated.

[–] BennyTheExplorer@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

What are you talking about?

I literally installed Signal on my Linux laptop yesterday and it automatically downloaded all my messages from my phone.

Last time I did that, it would only sync new messages