this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
651 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

82188 readers
3692 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
651
California introduces age verification law for all operating systems, including Linux and SteamOS — user age verified during OS account setup (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 2 days ago by Amoxtli@thelemmy.club to c/technology@lemmy.world
356 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 21 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Since people aren't reading the article and the headline is misleading. The law requires:

  • The OS ask the user their date of birth on account creation (kinda like the Steam date of birth prompts)
  • The OS provide an API that returns which of four age brackets the user fits in
  • Companies notified by the OS that the user is under age may be liable

It was explicitly written by the authors not to mandate ID or facial recognition checks. You can lie about your date of birth. This basically creates a standard set of parental controls for parents configuring kids devices.

I think that this might actually help with the whole discord facial recognition issue in places other than the UK by allowing them to offload the issue to parents setting up devices rather than collecting kids biometrics.

[–] BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

There are still so many problems with this. In addition to the general fuck you, it’s my computer, and fuck the state for forcing creeping surveillance on people, and how the hell would you enforce this, how would this even work for any of the following:

  • My RaspPi, running an older version of Linux. As far as I can tell, if I compile the kernel or write some code for it I would become the OS Provider.
  • A multiuser computer
  • A multiple people using the same account computer
  • Retro computing
  • A home media server. Maybe a NAS, maybe a home built machine.
  • A non-internet connected computer
  • Anything VM related
  • Any server in the cloud.
  • FreeDOS
  • An embedded machine in a car that I can ssh in to that crosses state lines.
  • An OS that doesn’t have the concept of user accounts
  • Hobby OS development
  • Oddball hardware that has been made to work as a general purpose computer, like a Chrome stick, hard drive controller or iPod?

It also looks like it applies to “covered application store” and from how that is defined, every public deb, apt, or yum repo is an application store, along with things like PyPI, crates.io, GitHub, and probably my own fucking git server that I share with some friends.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

Yeah I think this is pretty reasonable. If parents set their kids up on adult accounts that's on them.