this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
171 points (97.8% liked)

Europe

10596 readers
762 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hond@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

CDU - Black - Pre-MAGA Republicans

SPD - Red - Democrats with the same lack of Spine

Greens - Green - But apart from enviroment stuff not as progressive as one might think

FDP - Yellow - Libs

Linke - Red - Left

AFD - Blue - MAGA

Greens in BaWü - Dark Green - Because they are more like Republicans which arent opposed to renewables.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

CDU/CSU (Union) I'd compare to the Rockefeller Republicans, though nowadays with an icky nationalistic tint.

SPD is what Bernie would claim to be, but doesn't encapsulate what Bernie is, having sold out sometimes to neolibs. Bernie is what the SPD would've been, had it held its head straight.

Linke can be comparable to the DSA (Democratic Socialists USA).

FDP - Establishment Democrats

AfD - what you said, MAGA

Bundnis - What MAGAhats think communists are

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bundnis - What MAGAhats think communists are

BSW is a weird thing. I mean, it's a populist one-woman show designed to keep that woman in the discussion so she keeps getting invited and can sell her talks, but what Wagenknecht argues for are a. tankie takes and cuddling with Putin, and b. kinda socialist takes but only for germans. If it was a term not loaded with such historic weight and meaning, you could call the party "national socialist".
Now, obviously actual national socialists, Nazis, were what they were, the absolute worst thing you could ever imagine. But without that context and taking the terms at face value, that would be BSW.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Call me stupid (and you'd be justified for calling me so!), but I feel like it's a good thing if BSW is there in that it snoops votes away from people who otherwise vote AfD. They're both terrible, but BSW at least tries to fight privatisation where AfD puts everything into the hands of unelected profit-motivated tech moguls.

That said, I'd take the SDP, Grünen and Linke over those anyday.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That doesn't quite work though, BSW doesn't attract many AfD voters.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Huh. Where does its voter base then come from?

[–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago

From antivaxer idiots who don't vote Nazis and tankies who don't vote The Left.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

https://www.tagesschau.de/wahl/archiv/2025-02-23-BT-DE/charts/analyse-wanderung/chart_1873623.shtml

Here is a graph showing which party voters who voted BSW in the federal election of 2025 in the 2021 feseral election.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interesting. Many more people who didn't vote before, I see. About 1,880,000 votes.

So, about ...

23.4% from SPD
21.3% who didn't vote before
18.6% from Linke
13.8% from FDP
11.7% from Union
8% from Grünen
3.2% from AfD

Interesting. So it mainly got votes from the "non-Green" Left and non-voters, with FDP, Union, and Grünen having less joiners, but nonetheless fairly evenly distributed, and AfD last.

How about AfD?

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

Because the AfD isn't voted for their political positions. People vote AfD for vibes, hatred and misdirected frustration.

[–] Melchior@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Greens in BaWü - Dark Green - Because they are more like Republicans which arent opposed to renewables.

The Republicans are full on Nazis today. The BaWü Greens are not even close to as far to the right. Probably more like Democrats with some green paint.

[–] Hond@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah. You cant map the parties one to one either way. In some ways the Democrats are more right leaning than the CDU. But relative to each other it makes more or less sense considering how condensed and simplified i made it.

[–] shane@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interesting. I think that there's always been a tension between labor and environmentalists.

In the long term environmentally friendly policies help everyone, but in the short term they often inflict pain on someone, and often the workers (or farmers) bear the brunt of that, so they oppose the changes. Consider closing down factories that are polluting, or forcing farms to stop using pesticides.

[–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If you do feelgood environmental policy aimed at the emotional wellbeing of upper middle class academics on the back of, or with utter disregard for the working class, while the rich get to pollute all they like, you'll get tensions with the working class.

If there now is no decent working class party, the working class voters will instead flock to whoever bashes the Greens the loudest. Guess who that is.