Selfhosted

60910 readers

943 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

472

ntfy.sh v2.18.0 was written by AI (github.com)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by ueiqkkwhuwjw@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

187 comments fedilink hide all child comments

According to the release:

Adds experimental PostgreSQL support

The code was written by Cursor and Claude

14,997 added lines of code, and 10,202 lines removed

reviewed and heavily tested over 2-3 weeks

This makes me uneasy, especially as ntfy is an internet facing service. I am now looking for alternatives.

Am I overreacting or do you all share the same concern?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A many-month-long refactor on code you've already written is less than fun. While I don't love seeing a project I'm using being 80% replaced by Claude code, I've had Claude code look at some of my old projects and find underlying issues I was able to verify, and then suggested a more best-practice approach that I wasn't even aware of. The real question is, was the claude output better than the original code? If it is and it has unit tests and many eyes on it, it's quite possible that it's better off now.

I'll sit on my current versions for a few months and let everyone else test it out :)

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I agree with you, though even when I have just made a change myself, I am looking through the git diff like a crazy person.

So, still I think refactoring my own code is much more fun than telling AI to do it for me and then proceeding to review and test it for weeks (allegedly, lol).

You seem to be using it responsibly by asking it how things could be better.

I'd never copy and paste output from an AI or give it free roam to make a PR, etc myself.

I'll probably be sitting out on this update for a while too until I gage the general reactions of people heh :)