this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
317 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

82551 readers
4492 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Apple MacBook Neo's $599 starting price is a "shock" to the Windows PC industry, according to an Asus executive.

Hsu said he believes all the PC players—including Microsoft, Intel, and AMD—take the MacBook Neo threat seriously. "In fact, in the entire PC ecosystem, there have been a lot of discussions about how to compete with this product," he added, given that rumors about the MacBook Neo have been making the rounds for at least a year.

Despite the competitive threat, Hsu argued that the MacBook Neo could have limited appeal. He pointed to the laptop's 8GB of "unified memory," or what amounts to its RAM, and how customers can't upgrade it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I mean, at its heart, Mac OS is a heavily re-tooled fork of the BSD platform, so it's not inconceivable that it's light enough to run on 8G. I doubt it would run well on 8G, but it could do it.

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

My M1 MacBook Air idles at 1.03GB, my XPS 13 running Gnome on Vanilla OS idles at 2.4GB

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

GNOME on immutable distros = very bloated. Try antiX instead, as it uses a lighter DE.

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I’m not looking for anything lighter

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even a bloated GNOME runs with much less ram than Windows

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I’d be curious to see what Gnome looks like on Debian stable or the like

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

MacOS' kernel is derived from Mach, though with with some BSD code, and is Apple's own work since then. Its API is compatible with FreeBSD, but it's not FreeBSD. And the FreeBSD userland tools don't have effect on systemwide memory management.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

It runs fine, unless you load up on chrome tabs, or try to run pro apps. Itdoes basic photo editing and admin apps and phone holiday video editing just fine for average users. I have a lot of clients with 8GB M1 machines.

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

I know it was lighter than windows the last time I used Mac, but that has been quite a few years now. Hopefully it is a decent machine. Computing just keeps getting more expensive, so having more budget options is definitely good as long as they are reasonably functional.