LocalLLaMA

1 readers

1 users here now

Community to discuss about Llama, the family of large language models created by Meta AI.

founded 10 months ago

MODERATORS

communick@poweruser.forum

Is there a technical reason that distributed LLMs don't exist? (alien.top)

submitted 10 months ago by chinawcswing@alien.top to c/localllama@poweruser.forum

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Why is there no analog to napster/bittorent/bitcoin with LLMs?

Is there a technical reason that there is not some kind of open source LLM that we can all install on our local host which contributes computing power to answering prompts, and rewards those who contribute computing power by allowing them to enter more prompts?

Obviously, there must be a technical reason which prevents distributed LLMs or else it would have already been created by now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] metaprotium@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

It doesn't really make that much sense at runtime. By the time you get to running large enough models (think GPT-4) you will already have infrastructure built up from training, which you can then use for inference. Why not run queries through that 1 data center, to minimize latency? For pooled computing resources (prompts are run through 1 member in a pool, kinda like sheepit render farm) it would make more sense, but you're still limited by varying user hardware and software availability. People might have 1060s or 4090s, mistral 7Bs or llama-70Bs. Providing a service to end users means either (1) forcing users to accept quality inconsistency, or (2) forcing providers to maintain very specific software and hardware, plus limiting users to few models.