this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
351 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

82713 readers
3780 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] org@lemmy.org 53 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Joke’s on them. Mine is a Chinese company. I already know it spies on me. So does my car with its “disabled” cell connection that promises not to broadcast my whereabouts.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So does my car with its “disabled” cell connection that promises not to broadcast my whereabouts.

Find the antenna and physically unplug it.

[–] Zikeji@programming.dev 17 points 2 days ago

Physically unplugging it may not be enough and risks permanent damage. Installing a 50ohm terminator is a much safer option on all accounts and takes just about the same amount of effort as unplugging it ( ~$10 extra).

This is the guide I had used for my previous car: https://imgur.com/gallery/step-by-step-guide-to-disable-onstar-on-2022-chevy-bolt-this-is-reversible-not-permanent-n00QKnH#rGSoW34

[–] sheridan@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've been shopping for a dash cam. It seems like all the brands are Chinese companies except Garmin?

[–] org@lemmy.org 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I wouldn’t worry about it too much. You can get some without WiFi. You just have to yank the microsd if you want to see the files. The one I have has WiFi but it’s so slow I can’t even preview videos. I have to connect to its WiFi, so unless it’s randomly connecting to open WiFi’s while I’m driving without my knowledge, I can’t see how it would transit much.

Don’t spend too much though. They break after a couple years. Especially if you live in a hot climate like a desert.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 8 points 2 days ago

Yeah. If you get one that only records to an SD card and has no wireless connections of any kind, it would be pretty hard for that to have any security/privacy concerns.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

that's fine, if you only use it on private roads. but if not, you are recording plenty of people (even not counting drivers) who did not consent to being recorded.
then who knows what happens with the recordings. and that's the actual problem.

too bad its not enforced.

[–] uselessartifact@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Speaking as someone from the US, consent is not required to record someone in public.

"There is no responsible expectation of privacy while in public."

If you don't want to be recorded by people at random, stay home.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

in civilized countries consent is required for that

If you don't want to be recorded by people at random, ~~stay home.~~ you are free to die

[–] Orygin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

It's the same in most of Europe afaik. You can't be filmed as a primary subject without consent. For example, I can photograph you in the background of a monument or in nature, without having to ask your consent.
It's the same for dashcams, you are filming the road primarily not the pedestrian.

Edit: even better, in France (and iirc in Belgium too) I can photograph you as a primary subject without consent, but I cannot reproduce or distribute the picture of you without your consent.
Look up "Droit à l'image" if you want to know more.
Edit2: Hungary seems to have laws like I initially described, so taking pictures of videos in public should be okay as long as more than 1 person is visible on it.

[–] uselessartifact@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 hours ago

To be fair, if you're intentionally only filming one specific person, I'm sure they could claim harassment at some point. Maybe public disturbance or nuisance?