this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
114 points (98.3% liked)

Linux

12925 readers
897 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] refalo@programming.dev 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Linux is not an operating system, it's just the kernel and has no concept of users/accounts or logging in to anything.

A great many Linux-based distros ("operating systems") are not under US jurisdiction.

[–] tux0r@snac.rosaelefanten.org -5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Linux is not an operating system

Please do not start the "GNU/Linux" pedantry now.

many Linux-based distros (“operating systems”) are not under US jurisdiction

Repackaging US software - and Linux-the-kernel and much of Linux-the-userland is, obviously, US software - in Europe does not suddenly make US jurisdiction go away.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] tux0r@snac.rosaelefanten.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you have any reasonable point that invalidates mine?

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you see the difference of kernel maintainers in a particular jurisdiction being subject to their individual national law, however silly it may be, and the Linux kernel and derivates being licensed under GPL?

[–] tux0r@snac.rosaelefanten.org 2 points 2 days ago

I see that the leaders of kernel development had to remove maintainers for legal reason, because Linux is legally U.S.-based, so U.S. sanctions matter.

Yes, anyone could just fork it. But right now, the only relevant version of Linux is the one that is an U.S. kernel. 🤷‍♂️