this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
66 points (94.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35703 readers
4160 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] neptune@dmv.social 23 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Scientifically, we cannot yet talk about theories that are untestable and unfalsifiable. Sure, math or some other theory may imply other dimensions or parellel universes, but how will you measure one?

[–] ad_on_is@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] potterpockets@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oof sorry. Gonna need a protractor.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 1 points 11 months ago

Is that a tractor that lost its amateur status?

[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Scientifically, there are no theories that are untestable and unfalsifiable.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How can you test/falsify the existence of something you can't interact with in any way?

[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Most likely you couldn't. But sometimes you can be aware of something (X) simply by seeing the effect it has on other things, even if you can't directly observe X. Think of Pluto, dark matter and dark energy; didn't/don't know what it is, but we know something is there.

My original comment was pointing out that a scientific theory is a framework that takes into account all the data. So something that is untestable and unfalsifiable definitionally could not be a theory. You'd be in hypothesis territory at best, but likely just conjecture.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

Right, thanks for the clarification. Although in this context, the "theory" in question is the existence of alternate universes, so the most logical interpretation of your comment is that it is possible to test for the existence of an alternate universe.

[–] skulblaka@kbin.social -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There are a great many theories that are untestable and unfalsifiable. The existence of a God or a Creator is a hotly debated one, for instance.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Scientifically. No there aren't.

You're talking about hypotheses.

[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I think I know what you mean but if it's what I think you are doing a terrible job at explaining it. Theories in the scientific jargon are not the same as theories in the common parlance. What the commoner calls a "theory" is what we call a conjecture or an hypothesis. A theory in science is a summarization of experimental results, so if this is your take, I get your point.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think I know what you mean, but using words like parlance and commoner makes you sound like a douche nozzle.

[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I'm sorry. I should have said muggles.

[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

God is not a theory. There are no facts to support it and it has no predictive capabilities.

Evolution is a theory that demonstrates that species change via changes in genes. It is supported by facts and studies across multiple disciplines and has predictive capabilities.

One is science, the other is mythology.

[–] jasory@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

There are some facts to support it, the problem is in the latter. Merely describing a system isn't sufficient, it's predicting more information. One can just as easily describe physics "as the things that are" but this doesn't let us find more information about the universe.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If your mathematical model tells you something should exist, doesn't that necessarily mean that it's something you can interact with, and thus measure given sufficiently advanced technology?

[–] neptune@dmv.social 1 points 11 months ago

Perhaps but it's still not testable at that point.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Interestingly, parts of this universe are right now becoming unmeasurable, un observable, unfalsifiable to us even now. With dark energy propelling the expansion of space at an increasing rate, far-away regions of space can be moving away from us faster than light. This means they’re no longer part of our observable universe - we’ll never be able to reach them, see light from there, interact with these places in any way. Not the same universe anymore.

Someday living beings in the Milky Way might believe it’s the only galaxy that exists because no others will be observed. If one of them postulates that maybe there are all these other galaxies that are just out of reach - pinched off from our universe - in parallel universes you might say…. if someone says all that, it could also be just as handily dismissed.