this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
24 points (87.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5243 readers
473 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
24
The scariest climate plot in the world | do not let small children read this (www.theclimatebrink.com)
submitted 1 year ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] porcariasagrada@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

so you think that a humanity going from climate disaster to climate disaster on a global scale, will have the resources to achieve total atmospheric control?

and please explain to me how putting co2 in the atmosphere is as easy as taking it out? because i can burn down 20000000 trees in a day but you can't grow 20000000 in a day.

so no, 200 years for total atmospheric, considering the future that waits us, is simply delusional.

[โ€“] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

It's obviously not as easy. It's a matter of low carbon energy production. Make enough energy and you can do whatever you want.